Skip to content

Edmund Burke on virtue, experience and political leadership

Words from the past for the present.

… no name, no power, no function, no artificial institution whatsoever, can make the men, of whom any system of authority is composed, any other than God, and Nature, and education, and their habits of life have made them. Capacities beyond these the people have not to give.

Virtue and wisdom may be the objects of their choice; but their choice confers neither the one nor the other on those upon whom they lay their ordaining hands. They have not the engagement of Nature, they have not the promise of Revelation for any such powers.

After I had read over the list of the persons and descriptions elected into the Tiers État, nothing which they afterwards did could appear astonishing. Among them, indeed, I saw some of known rank, some of shining talents; but of any practical experience in the state not one man was to be found. The best were only men of theory.

But whatever the distinguished few may have been, it is the substance and mass of the body which constitutes its character, and must finally determine its direction. In all bodies, those who will lead must also, in a considerable degree, follow. They must conform their propositions to the taste, talent, and disposition of those whom they wish to conduct: therefore, if an assembly is viciously or feebly composed in a very great part of it, nothing but such a supreme degree of virtue as very rarely appears in the world, and for that reason cannot enter into calculation, will prevent the men of talents disseminated through it from becoming only the expert instruments of absurd projects.

If, what is the more likely event, instead of that unusual degree of virtue, they should be actuated by sinister ambition and a lust of meretricious glory, then the feeble part of the assembly, to whom at first they conform, becomes, in its turn, the dupe and instrument of their designs. In this political traffic, the leaders will be obliged to bow to the ignorance of their followers, and the followers to become subservient to the worst designs of their leaders.

Edmund Burke – Reflections on the Revolution in France

See also:

Edmund Burke on Circumstances and Political Principles; or, Context is King

Conservatism and the status quo
Progressive. Conservative.
Stability: Burke and incremental change
Edmund Burke on learning’s purpose and reward
Hannah Arendt on the abolition of distance, abstraction and alienation
Ceteris Paribus; or, Local Conditions (Surf Lessons #9)
Leadership (2): Context and  Complexity; or, A Place to Stand
Educated (11): Truth in context
Contextualising best practice: one size does not fit all
Cause and Effect (1): J. L. Mackie on INUS conditions

I'd love to hear your thoughts and recommended resources...